On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Sheldon Rampton wrote:
(2) A presumption against publishing articles on people who have been victims of stalking, in cases where publication of an article on Wikipedia might subject them to additional harassment.
For a while I've thought something like "Wikipedia is not the creator of news" should apply. (Probably badly worded; reword as you wish). If creating a Wikipedia article itself helps to spread or advance something described in the article, we shouldn't have it. (This only applies when that article specifically, not just Wikipedia in general, advances a cause. We wouldn't delete the article for Internet or the one for Wikipedia itself.)
This would cover publishing an article about anyone famous for being stalked. Creating a Wikipedia article inherently participates in the stalking, and so should be avoided. This would also cover GNAA; GNAA's name was deliberately chosen so that using it would offend, and for us to have a GNAA article would be assisting in GNAA activities. (And even if its name wasn't itself offensive, trolls want publicity. so having articles about them--thus publicizing them--would violate this proposed principle.)
This is not current policy, but maybe it should be.