On 6/5/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/5/07, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I thought there was an established review process for featured articles - on what authority did you just remove it from the list? If there was a BLP violation, then remove it from the article, certainly, but there is no need to unilaterally remove its featured status when there is a perfectly good process for doing that.
I'm sorry, that just doesn't make sense. Featured articles are supposed to be our *best* articles. not steaming piles of excrement.
I don't know about one of the best, but I found the article to be interesting and half-decent (though a little bit rambling), up until the "Social Impacts" section (which I skipped as it sounds like a boring topic).
Why do you think the article was a steaming pile of excrement? Had you ever seen the video before reading it? I've never seen it, nor did I read the transcript. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Probably because here in the West, it sounds like an Internet Phenomenon. Problem is, while it might just have been one of those here, in Hong Kong, it may have had real cultural impact.