On 05/06/07, Nick Wilkins nlwilkins@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/07, Tony Sidaway tonysidaway@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/5/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I thought there was an established review process for featured articles - on what authority did you just remove it from the list? If there was a BLP violation, then remove it from the article, certainly, but there is no need to unilaterally remove its featured status when there is a perfectly good process for doing that.
I'm sorry, that just doesn't make sense. Featured articles are supposed to be our *best* articles. not steaming piles of excrement.
So, what's wrong with going to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review]] and saying "this is a steaming pile of excrement"?
IDONTLIKEIT is presumably frowned upon at Featured Article Review.