On 6/5/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I thought there was an established review process for featured
articles - on what authority did you just remove it from the list? If
there was a BLP violation, then remove it from the article, certainly,
but there is no need to unilaterally remove its featured status when
there is a perfectly good process for doing that.
I'm sorry, that just doesn't make sense. Featured articles are
supposed to be our *best* articles. not steaming piles of excrement.
So, what's wrong with going to [[Wikipedia:Featured article review]] and
saying "this is a steaming pile of excrement"?