Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 6/5/07, William Pietri william@scissor.com wrote:
If it's not important to you, why not endorse restoring it
Four letters: G F D L
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't people argued that it's sufficiently GFDL-compatible in that it links to source articles for the minimum five authors? And that further, if the links to deleted articles invalidated the GFDL-goodness of those bits, isn't that cause for deleting only those bits? And really, does anybody believe that this is a violation of the spirit of the license, or that a single contributor of BJAODN material cares?
Also, if the new rule is that we must speedy delete all articles that don't have full history publicly visible at the moment, then isn't there a lot of deleting we should go do right away?
William