Guy Chapman aka JzG schreef:
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:22:17 +0100, "James
Farrar"
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You
think. Me, I think it might have been exactly as stated: OK,
let's finally grab this tiger by the tail.
Yes, per [[IDONTLIKEIT]].
Or possibly per the reason stated.
No, apart from [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]], [[WP:BLP]], [[WP:NPA]], [[WP:FU]] and
[[WP:NOT]], there was not a single reason for deletion of these pages,
and it's a scandal that they have not been undeleted already.
The failure to recognize that BJAODN deliberately violates the norms of the
rest of Wikipedia in order to make the culture healthier and the
encyclopedia better (similar to how people can experiment in the Sandbox,
but not the mainspace) is extraordinarily disappointing.
It's called Bad Jokes And Other Deleted Nonsense for a reason.