On 6/3/07, James Farrar <james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/06/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar
<james.farrar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/06/07, Brock Weller <brock.weller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It does not. Them recieving it is not the action
that causes the
infringement, but rather us giving it to them that does.
Ah, but "we" don't give it to "them"; "they" take it.
It's "their"
action, not "ours".
Even if you successfully make the argument that the downloader is the
one
doing the infringing (an argument which I thought
you said was "fucked
up"),
"Fucked up" is blaming the site for the downloader's infringement.
LOL. Before you said that" if the infringement of copyright is the act of
"purchase", not "sale", the US legal system is seriously fucked
up." Then
you said that "All of which look to me like that which is done by the
infringer, not by the person who acquires the infringed material."
Now you're contradicting yourself.