On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/07, Brock Weller brock.weller@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
[I fixed your post for you.]
On 04/06/07, Brock Weller brock.weller@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote: > > On 03/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote: > > On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote: > > > As I said, if the infringement of copyright is the act of
"purchase",
> > > not "sale", the US legal system is seriously fucked up. > > > > > > Infringement is the act of "copying", "distribution", or
"public
> > performance/display". > > All of which look to me like that which is done by the
infringer,
not
> by the person who acquires the infringed material.
Most likely, yes, and no one said otherwise.
*Bzzzzt*. You said "Each time someone downloads the page there is
a
new infringement". That means that something done by the person
who
acquires the material causes the infringement.
Each time we serve up copyrighted material is a new infringement.
It's
not
hard to understand. Anthony happens to be correct here.
Ah, so an action by the person receiving the material *does* cause an infringement! Anthony said it didn't.
It does not. Them recieving it is not the action that causes the infringement, but rather us giving it to them that does.
Ah, but "we" don't give it to "them"; "they" take it. It's "their" action, not "ours".
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
"that" argument is the one "I" just told "you" was wrong. Read the rest of my post.