On 03/06/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 6/3/07, Sean Barrett <sean(a)epoptic.com>
wrote:
It's
also important to point out that US law provides a three year
limitation to prosecute for infringement of copyright. Material that
has already been there for three years cannot be subject.
=20
=20
Each time someone downloads the page there is a new infringement, and s=
o a
new three years.
{{verify}}{{dubious}}<cough>bullshit</cough>
http://www.google.com/search?q=copyright+statute+of+limitations
Next time read the rest of the thread before making an ass out of yourself.
"However, the courts are divided as to how this applies."
http://law.freeadvice.com/intellectual_property/copyright_law/copyright_sta…
As I said, if the infringement of copyright is the act of "purchase",
not "sale", the US legal system is seriously fucked up.