On 03/06/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
Really? What is it, since DRV sure doesn't seem to fit the bill?
DRV for individual actions arbcom for admin behaviour.
Hey, it's besides the point anyway. You've advocated a single person's opinion (without that person neading any reason more than IDONTLIKEIT) being sufficient to change the requirement for inclusion from "consensus to delete" to "overwhelming consensus to keep, and even that might not be enough".