<sigh>
This whole debate has me -->THIS<-- close to grabbing a spider man costume and
buying a plane ticket to Germany....
Seriously, I know copyright is critical, but I can't help but think it was used as a
means to the desired end in this case.
</sigh>
Philippe
----- Original Message -----
From: The Cunctator
To: English Wikipedia
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Seriously, on BJAODN
On 6/2/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/2/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net>
wrote:
So going through the dreadful prose in that
provision I find reference
to blatant copyright violation which must also meet four further
criteria. It then goas on to add, "When tagging a page for deletion
under this criterion, a user should notify the page's creator". Is
there a listing somewhere to show that these notices were in fact
given?
Can you show who the creator was?
We're talking about a 2007 series of
deletions, not ones that happened
in 2005.
BJAODN is old. Some of it is taken from stuff deleted before 2005. We
do not have deleted revisions that far back.
Please god, let someone sue Wikipedia for a one-liner that appears on
BJAODN for several years.
Because the resultant mockery of the case would finally get you
(maybe) to realize how completely insane this attitude is.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l