<sigh>
This whole debate has me -->THIS<-- close to grabbing a spider man costume and buying a plane ticket to Germany....
Seriously, I know copyright is critical, but I can't help but think it was used as a means to the desired end in this case.
</sigh>
Philippe ----- Original Message ----- From: The Cunctator To: English Wikipedia Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Seriously, on BJAODN
On 6/2/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/2/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
So going through the dreadful prose in that provision I find reference to blatant copyright violation which must also meet four further criteria. It then goas on to add, "When tagging a page for deletion under this criterion, a user should notify the page's creator". Is there a listing somewhere to show that these notices were in fact given?
Can you show who the creator was?
We're talking about a 2007 series of deletions, not ones that happened in 2005.
BJAODN is old. Some of it is taken from stuff deleted before 2005. We do not have deleted revisions that far back.
Please god, let someone sue Wikipedia for a one-liner that appears on BJAODN for several years.
Because the resultant mockery of the case would finally get you (maybe) to realize how completely insane this attitude is.
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l