The problem is these are massive GFDL violations.
There was a huge thread
over at ANI when they were deleted, and the thread came to acceptance. You
should not have restored.
On 6/2/07, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I started undeleting them, but JOG's redeleting them, and this is too
absurd to wheelwar over.
What on earth is his problem?
On 6/2/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/06/07, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Jeffrey O. Gustafson wrote:
> > To the point of your hyperbolic complaint, please see
> >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:EL#Restrictions_on_linking ...
"Sites that
> > violate the copyrights of others per
contributors' rights and
obligations
>
should not be linked."
> Actually, yesterday in this thread I posted a link to the Wikipedia
> database dumps and pointed out that the deleted BJAODN pages were
still
in them.
So unless linking to Wikipedia database dumps is now
prohibited, it's not as simple as it seems.
And I see that The Cunctator just undeleted them all.
If there's a wheel war over this, I swear I'm adding it to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP%3ALAME#Wheel_wars .
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Brock
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: