On 6/1/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
Again, the "articles" subforum was initially set up to discuss, in-depth, problems with article content. This is more or less what I'm referring to: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=1286&view=findpost..., and even that doesn't really go *that* in-depth. But evaluations of that nature can be constructive to Wikipedia, and are one of the few occasions where a link to WR /might/ make sense on an article talkpage.
Here's a recent example, which actually led to an AfD for some nonsense: