On 7/28/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, it's not that it's all that bad, it's that you've elevated it to something that it's not, namely important enough to talk about.
We weren't talking about it because it was important. We were talking about it because it was fun.
But it's not really that fun, either. Or maybe I'm missing something. What's so fun, original, interesting or special about the site? This is the issue, really, with hate sites on-line, they tend to point to human de-evolution. I've never heard a racist say anything new, interesting, original or accurate. They're boring. They're repetitive. They're unoriginal. Again, maybe I missed something, and there was something interesting and original about the site, but I don't think so. I think it is the usual: low grade, plagiarized, unoriginal, copies of the same old crap that the usual round of bigots need to keep their heads filled with in order to prevent some sense or original thoughts from creeping in.
This is what these sites crave, anyone who's never encountered their boring repetitive drivel, who is willing to challenge them, to give them the attention they crave and are incapable of getting any other way.
Of course, I could be wrong, maybe there was something original, interesting or creative in this site, but I doubt it, because generally the whole point of bigotry is to prevent original thought.
KP