On 7/22/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Actually, those conditions seem pretty reasonable and in tune with existing policy to me. But it allows album covers, book covers, all manner of screenshot, exactly the sorts of things that have recently become subjects of contention. So I'm not sure where the conflict lies here.
Getting the 2-3 sentances to be about the media in question. Most articles on albums do not talk about the album covers. Dito bookcovers. Screenshots may be slightly better but still people tend to include them without talking about them (for example the comment on [[Image:Ebay-homepage.png]] appears to be 3 words).