That's a good one. One of the points of expedited cleanup should be :
do we want the original contributor to return and edit again in the
future? Will they be upset to find the article has moved or
disappeared? How can we make them feel welcome in the community while
critiquing and changing their work? which is one of the important
aspects of review that gets lost in many AfD processes.
To your next post: agreed that this shouldn't be bureaucratic; just an
implementation of polite interactions and good faith to improve and
lend better context to deletion discussions.
SJ
On 7/14/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 17:55:51 +0100, "David
Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Brilliant!
And one of the outcomes should be: expedited cleanup. If not
performed, it can be stubbed or deleted after a week.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
++SJ