On 14/07/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:11:02 +0100, "David
Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Um, no - it's because they pull shit like
trashing an RFA because the
>candidate fails to support their failed policy.
The 'crats should set an example by explicitly
ignoring such idiocy.
Unless of course the links were actually harassment, in which case it
doesn't matter what words we use, they still have to go.
No, I mean SlimVirgin asked Gracenotes if he supported the policy, he
said "case by case is best" and she went to town on the RFA. This has
been discussed at length on this list already. I'm sure I recall you
participating in the thread at the time.
- d.