Steven Walling wrote:
generally, it seems to be a project built to do what user:Alasnohn has been doing for high school AFDs; dredging up a large amount of references from non-independent sources and local sports coverage to try and salvage articles that, because they are nn and useless except as draws for student vandals, were unsourced previously and rightly nominated for deletion.
On 7/13/07, Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez@gmail.com wrote:
It's yet another army-fantasy like project (think of countervandalism unit). But it's a good place where they can gather the terminal patients so we can go and help them die in peace instead of lenghtening their suffering instead of looking them by ourselves. Thank you for that
What heaping boatload of bad faith you guys are assuming.
The described purpose of the project is not "keep everything at all costs!", it's "make things that might be deleted due to bad quality into things that will be kept due to good quality." It explicitly limits itself to topics where the _topic_ is a valid one to have an article on. Is this not a worthy goal?