On 7/12/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:39:48 -0700, "George
Herbert"
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Want to make a run at another attempt at putting
up a policy, since we
all seem to have a happy middle ground here?
George, what you say makes good sense as always. Our memories of
events are coloured by our personal biases, I guess, but the militants
are not there right now, so absolutely yes, try for a new and workable
guideline.
Perhaps...
Previous problem - coming at the problem from the "are they notable?
yes/no" direction was the fatal flaw and unsolvable disagreement.
Current approach - come at the problem this time from the viewpoint of
"school articles should only contain notable and reliably sourced
information. school stubs, with only minimal notable and reliably
sourced information, should be merged into ..."
We don't even have to come to a solution on the first problem, to
solve the second one. 8-)
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com