On 7/13/07, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.net wrote:
On 12/07/07, Mak makwik@gmail.com wrote:
Be bold in removing cleanup tags! If the article is cleaned up, it no
longer
needs the tag. If the person who placed it disagrees with your removal,
they
can replace it. Administrators should not have extra editorial rights,
so it
makes no sense to wait for one to remove a cleanup tag.
on 7/12/07 4:46 PM, David Gerard at dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. Admins tend to be experienced editors, but the two are not synonymous - "administrator" is a janitorial post, not an editorial one.
- d.
Thanks, David. But what about a case where I add some information to a fairly large Article that contains the "unreferenced" tag, include the source of the information I added, but the remainder of the Article may contain other material that is unsourced?
Replace it with the {{more sources}} tag, I think. I find articles which use {{unreferenced}} despite having references very irritating, because {{unreferenced}} is only for totally unsourced articles. It's especially annoying on articles with a lot of references, but one or two totally unreferenced (And sometimes just sparsely referenced) sections.
Johnleemk