On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:10:20 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
It is helpful to support productive editors and administrators and protect them from harassment both on and off Wikipedia. Certain sites contain little or no critical discussion, but a great deal of material which either attempts to identify anonymous Wikipedia editors or to harass them in some way.
You complain about the justification being repeated, but continue to say you see no justification...
That is a justification for banning links to such *pages*, not the entire *sites* they're on!
As Fred said, "You complain about the justification being repeated, but continue to say you see no justification..."
Pay particular attention to this phrase: "Certain sites contain little or no critical discussion, but a great deal of material which either attempts to identify anonymous Wikipedia editors or to harass them in some way."
Now, we might say that a broken clock is right twice a day, but it would be pointless to use it as a referent just because we happen to know that it' about that time.
Guy (JzG)