On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:29:49 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
Determined effort to link in the face of warnings is only a behavior problem once it has been established that making the link is inappropriate and the warnings are necessary. But for the attack sites policy, this is the *very thing in dispute*.
Please try to separate the two issues. No separate policy is needed in order to request people not to link to sites that habitually engage in harassment and outing. Existing policies already cover this, as was made plain in the MONGO arbitration. It's an unreliable source (hence invalid in the article) and a site rife with harassment (hence inappropriate in project space). The mature response to this being pointed out is "oh, right." Pressing the issue and escalating it is not likely to have any god result. No amount of Wikidrama will ever make that an acceptable source, after all.
Guy (JzG)