On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:28:37 -0400, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, because it's a message board with no editorial
oversight, run and
contributed to by various anonymous individuals. Even worse, it is
filled with fantastic tales of conspiracies and intrigues, 90% of them
without any factual basis whatsoever, and the other 10% extremely
slanted views with typically only a vague connection with reality.
Yes, exactly that. WR is a bad cite. Not a WP:BADSITE, a really
/bad/ cite. That's why it should not be included. No editorial
oversight, not even a token attempt to be neutral.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG