On 7/9/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:43:43 -0400, "Daniel R. Tobias" dan@tobias.name wrote:
Fine... that's a reasonable line of argument when it comes to considering using that site as a source. However, using that argument makes the issue a content dispute, where the proper way to resolve it is through calm, reasonable discussion on the talk page...
Not really. See the principles in the MONGO arbitration. Linking to harassment sites may be considered harassment. Don't do it.
"may be"? If we shouldn't link to them at all (as implied by "Don't do it") then shouldn't it be "is harassment" instead?
Johnleemk