On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
If WR links were only deleted for not being reliable
sources, we wouldn't
be *having* this fuss. Most of the questionable deletions of WR and similar
links are under circumstances where reliable sources are irrelevant--talk
pages, Wikipedia signpost, etc.
Why post a link to a site which engages in harassment and outing, if
it's not even a reliable source? In what way is that not dickish?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG