On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
If WR links were only deleted for not being reliable sources, we wouldn't be *having* this fuss. Most of the questionable deletions of WR and similar links are under circumstances where reliable sources are irrelevant--talk pages, Wikipedia signpost, etc.
Why post a link to a site which engages in harassment and outing, if it's not even a reliable source? In what way is that not dickish?
Guy (JzG)