On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:30:08 +0100, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
The active remedy from MONGO applies only to ED, not to WR or any other site that someone decides is an "attack site".
Wikilawyering, I'm afraid. The active remedy is based on the following principles:
Links to attack site 3) Links to attack sites may be removed by any user; such removals are exempt from 3RR. Deliberately linking to an attack site may be grounds for blocking.
Support of harassment 7) Users who link to webpages which attack or harass other users or to sites which regularly engage in such activity are responsible for their actions Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#Off-wiki_personal_attacks.
Outing sites as attack sites 11) A website that engages in the practice of publishing private information concerning the identities of Wikipedia participants will be regarded as an attack site whose pages should not be linked to from Wikipedia pages under any circumstances.
Tell me how WR does not fit these criteria.
Guy (JzG)