On 08/07/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh, and then can we begin discussing how Hempel's Raven paradox eluicidates precisely why confirmatory instances do so much less than disconfirmatory instances, and from there move on to a discussion of Bayesian vs. frequentists interpretations of observation and theory? (Possibly bringing a bit of computer science's denotational semantics by way of digital philosophy?)
No.
No, you need to be a bunch of Wikipedians down the pub boring any non-encyclopedists unfortunate enough to be stuck at your table.
- d.