K P wrote:
Here's an article about a crash that
didn't happen, to two planes on
two different runways, although apparently one is in the take-off line
of the other, where there were no injuries or damages to either
aircraft that didn't crash into each other, with speculation about a
controller error, and no NTSB report yet issued.
I love Wikipedia, Britannica eat your hear out.
One of my old favorites is up for deletion right now, for the fourth
time, and looks likely to go the way of the dodo this time around.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus_Prime_%28person%29>. Just in time
for the release of the new Transformers movie, too.
It was heavily referenced, non-controversial, and a fun little piece of
trivia. I really don't understand why some editors feel the need to get
rid of such stuff. There are days that Wikipedia makes me depressed.
I've added my vote. Perhaps too each previous "keep" decision
should
automatically add two keep votes to a nomination; each "no consensus"
should add one.
Perhaps we should also ban the use of that great weasel word "obviously"
from all deletion nomination statements.