On 7/4/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/07/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/4/07, John Lee johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
One example? I can think of a lot more than just the Teresa Nielsen Hayden case. Links to "attack sites" have been removed from the Signpost in the past, and people like Dan Tobias have been aggressively highlighting them on the list.
The link removal from the Signpost was a bad idea?
Yes, it was removed on a bad basis.
Just because Dan Tobias doesn't like something, it doesn't mean it's a bad thing.
And just because he doesn't like something, it doesn't mean it's a good thing.
You may care to, I don't know, address the issues? Just an idea.
You have it backwards; the assertion was made that all sorts of negative things were happening because Dan Tobias said they were. That's not a proof of anything.