On 7/2/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 2 Jul 2007 at 01:09:59 +1000, "Stephen Bain" stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
Bauder could have chosen his words more carefully, but there is not really any contradiction. As he says, arbitration rulings are not policy and should not be taken as such. What he leave out is the implicit corollary that rulings are applications of policy to particular situations, and similar situations ought to be approached in similar
And how, exactly, is what Kamryn did "similar" to anything that was addressed in the past rulings? She was providing a relevant reference to an article, not engaging in harrassment or attacks.
I explicitly said that I wasn't commenting on this particular situation, but only on the observation that there were contradictions in what Fred said.