On 7/2/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 2 Jul 2007 at 01:09:59 +1000, "Stephen
Bain"
<stephen.bain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Bauder could have chosen his words more
carefully, but there is not
really any contradiction. As he says, arbitration rulings are not
policy and should not be taken as such. What he leave out is the
implicit corollary that rulings are applications of policy to
particular situations, and similar situations ought to be approached
in similar
And how, exactly, is what Kamryn did "similar" to anything that was
addressed in the past rulings? She was providing a relevant
reference to an article, not engaging in harrassment or attacks.
I explicitly said that I wasn't commenting on this particular
situation, but only on the observation that there were contradictions
in what Fred said.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com