On 03/07/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/2/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
Now, ED is specifically mentioned in Remedies (1) and Enforcement, so it seems clear to me that ArbCom's intent was that the ruling shold apply only to ED;
No, it wasn't. I was there.
Then why do all the remedies apply only to ED? Why is there no mention of setting up an official list of recognised attack sites?
however, it's equally clear that certain individuals are keen to exploit the general nature of Principles (3), despite the reception that [[WP:BADSITES]] got from the community at large.
James, we've moved on to sensible discussion, no more straw-man policy hysteria labels.
Sorry, but [[WP:BADSITES]] explains quite clearly that the community rejected it.