On 7/2/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/07/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Information you have approved for publication in the New York Times is not "private information".
Define "private information".
See your local wikilawyer if you want to go down that path. I'll stick to common sense.
If you're referring to the linking of real names to account names without authorisation by the person in question, this mailing list has been guilty of that at times. This would then make wikimedia.org unlinkable.
I think the issues with your slippery slope arguments have already been pointed out.
The Mongo ruling is a blunt instrument. It's not surprising it's hurting the encyclopedia.
Evidence?