http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Packer
This seems to be of a guy who's notable for getting himself repeatedly interviewed in news coverage of various things as a non- notable "man on the street".
In addition to the Wikipedia-internal issues of whether somebody like that should have an article, this raises the point that, in the "real world" as well as on Wikipedia forums, appearances of public sentiment, opinion, consensus, and so on can be deceiving, as the people (even when they seem like "just ordinary folks") who are seen or heard expressing their views on something (on the TV news or on a Wikipedia talk page or mailing list) are a self-selected bunch who want to be heard, or want attention, or have other motives that set them apart from the "masses".