On 6/30/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/30/07, The Mangoe the.mangoe@gmail.com wrote:
It is incontrovertibly a reliable source for the continuing notability of the incident.
I do not think thats an accurate assessment. Just because something is covered, doesn't make it notable. Just as something not covered on media is not non-notable.
You imply, in saying this, that media coverage is irrelevant to notability. I say that in general media coverage IS the "noting" that makes notability. That it is noted is prima facie evidence of notability.