Steve Bennett wrote:
Have a look at [[Club skifield]] (which I wrote).
Follow the external
link. Is it really worth our (my) while attempting to write something
that surpasses the link in terms of quality, depth, comprehensiveness
of coverage? Practically speaking, who is going to be reading
Wikipedia that doesn't have access to the net, but needs that
information?
Wikipedia is not a web directory. There are (or were, at least) people
who condense Wikipedia on CD/DVDs for use by those who don't have
(reliable) internet access. This sort of distribution is a fundamental
objective of the project. Suggesting that we don't need to include
information because it's available elsewhere on the web suggests a
misunderstanding of the project.
-Rich