On 1/16/07, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. This was an AfD where no new arguments were made from the previous AfD. Yes, consensus can change. But consensus is also not a random phenomenon based on who shows up on a given day. In the absence of any new claims about the article, it would have been wholly reasonable to take into account the previous overwhelming decision to keep the article,
Seeing as that was in 2005 and we have somewhat tightened up on sourceing requirements since them it is hardly unepected that things will change.
to note the egregiously poor reasoning of some of the votes ("not every game by Nintendo is notable," as one person argued - a position that is so far removed from our existing practice as to be unusable.
The comparison is flawed since Nintendo are a multi billion dollar company (there probably are games without article in any case due to the various times large numbers of low quality games were put on one cartridge)
A better one might be "every painting by Picasso" "every compound featured in "Journal of Organic Chemistry"
If Dayfree Press is of some signifcance surely any referenced info on "Able and Baker" could be merged into it since the article is hardly overloaded with information or citations.