Thomas Dalton wrote:
What is wrong
with 'move on' as a form of dispute resolution? Beats vendetta and vindictiveness
any day.
It's simply resolving the dispute by accepting defeat. In some cases,
the dispute may be so trivial that it's easier to simply let the other
person win, but not always.
Saying "Move on" can be a convenient tactical strategem for winning an
argument, especially if the article is in your preferred state when you
say it. Sometimes finding a third path is preferable to putting the
issue into a win/lose paradigm.
Ec