Wait. Disregard my question. Turns up there's no inconsistence -- it's that
the guy I was thinking of actually has a darn good article.
On 1/3/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/01/07, Parker Peters <onmywayoutster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, no.
This is something that leaves the Wikipedia/Media foundation with some
serious legal problems, if one person's managed to get their bio deleted
and
another person's having that prevented
(I'm pretty sure I know who Mr.
Hare
is referring to, too).
"Serious legal problems" cannot be fantasised into existence; we are
under no legal bound to host someone's article or delete someone
else's on request. We are not a court system or a legal system, bound
by our own precedent; we're a private community with mutable community
rules.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sam_Vaknin
looks like an unambiguous delete decision to me by the community. We
did it consistent with our own rules.
And weren't you making a big song and dance about leaving three months
ago?
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l