Wait. Disregard my question. Turns up there's no inconsistence -- it's that the guy I was thinking of actually has a darn good article.
On 1/3/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/01/07, Parker Peters onmywayoutster@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, no.
This is something that leaves the Wikipedia/Media foundation with some serious legal problems, if one person's managed to get their bio deleted
and
another person's having that prevented (I'm pretty sure I know who Mr.
Hare
is referring to, too).
"Serious legal problems" cannot be fantasised into existence; we are under no legal bound to host someone's article or delete someone else's on request. We are not a court system or a legal system, bound by our own precedent; we're a private community with mutable community rules.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sam_Vaknin looks like an unambiguous delete decision to me by the community. We did it consistent with our own rules.
And weren't you making a big song and dance about leaving three months ago?
--
- Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l