Bogdan Giusca wrote:
Wikipedia has way too many articles on websites,
webcomics and
other types of internet content -- likely thousands.
Too many on these subjects, or too few on "good" subjects?
The problem is that around 95% of those articles are
not sourced (or
they are sourced from forum and blog posts) and at least 70% won't be
able to be sourced because they were never mentioned in the mainstream
press -- and probably very few were mentioned in books and journals.
If the subject is of trivial importance the sources should matter less.
Since when did the mainstream press become obligatory?
I deleted about 50 of them, which looked totally
non-notable, but if I
had to apply the rules, at least 80% would have to be deleted for
lacking notability claims.
Makes you sound like a regular crusader.
Can anyone suggest any solution to this?
Yes. Spend more time _adding_ good content, and stop wasting your own
time trying to get rid trivial material. If the article starts with,
"This article is about a webcomic," the readers are forwarned about the
value of the article.
Ec
Ec