I hesitate to bring up something that's apparently pretty contentious, but let me ask one small question.
Rob Smith wrote:
The problem is *why *the Brandt bio was created in the first place. This was *before* BLP, and strong evidence exists it was created with malicious intent to defame Brandt, using a questionable source. This evidence has been reviewed, presumably at the Foundation level.
Do you feel the current article doesn't meet BLP and other standards?
Thanks,
William