on 2/20/07 7:44 AM, Rich Holton at richholton(a)gmail.com wrote:
I know that the list admins have been criticized of
late for letting
through messages that people have questioned. However, this list is the
forum of last resort for people who have been banned from post to Wikipedia.
I'm one of those who see very little harm in letting through a hostile
message. No one is forced to read the message.
I'm also curious about the content of these messages. I have been pushed
on this list to provide evidence for abusive admins.
If calling an admin "abusive" is itself a personal attack, then am I in
danger of being moderated when I provide such evidence? Is it the mere
fact that the user in question called certain admins "abusive" the
grounds for not posting the message?
I also have a problem with someone censoring what I read based on their own
personal sensitivity.
Marc Riddell