I'm with Oskar. If they call various administrators abusive they should be able to back that up. Of course, the smarter response is to talk it out with the admin in question so it doesn't come to such accusations.
Mgm
On 2/20/07, Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/20/07, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
For transparency, the moderated user "countpointercount" has the following message for subscribers to the mailing list:
'Your "moderators" are now claiming that any reporting of abusive administrators is a "personal attack." This is obvious coverup behavior.'
This is in response to my rejection of two emails, both of which I considered to contain personal attacks because they called various administrators 'abusive' etc. What are the thoughts of subscribers to the list on this? What would the appropriate course of action have been?
~Mark Ryan
Speaking for myself (and, I think, a number of other users), I completely trust your and the other mods capability to judge whether or not a post contains personal attacks. Ask him to state his case in a more civil and neutral manner, and if he does so, let it through.
Not using personal attacks is the most basic criteria for being allowed in the conversation, and if he can't do that, he shouldn't be allowed to post.
Keep up the good work.
--Oskar
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l