A sysop is able to "descent from the clouds" and "rain holy thunder upon him"?
I find it rather questionable that you make these metaphors... adminship is not something godly that is used to lay whoopass down upon others... it should be used as a tool to help the editors, not to burn them.
And seriously, I do not believe in Jimbos "devine vengeance"...
On 16/02/07, Flame Viper flameviper12@yahoo.com wrote:
It would be a terrible idea to give *every editor* admin powers. If you don't believe me, let me give an outline of what would happen:
- Main page is deleted/restored/deleted/unprotected/protected/etc
- Main page is replaced with tubgirl/goatse/meatspin
3: MediaWiki namespace is trashed/vandalised/deleted 4: Random editors are blocked for no reason 5: Random pages are deleted/protected for no reason
And the terrible thing about this is that nobody could stop it. Normally, when an edit war breaks out, a sysop is able to descend from the clouds and settle things. When there is an abusive editor, a sysop can rain holy thunder upon him.
If every editor can block, unblock, and generally destroy everything, who's next? Will the bureaucrats have to step in and lay down a Supreme Block? And then what if Bureaucrat is made a default right? And up until Steward? Will Jimbo have to step into the fray and lay his divine vengeance?
Now the continuation of expanding user rights is just hypothetical, but it gives you an idea.
Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l