David Gerard wrote:
On 19/02/07, K P kpbotany@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds familiar, except you're missing an important part: it must be easy, also, to lose adminship. In other words, it really must be no big deal, which it currently isn't (no big deal).
This is unlikely to happen - it strikes me there's not a lot of net plus in firing the experienced admins. The cases aren't symmetrical.
Nobody is promoting a wholesale purge of admins. Because of their leadership position they should be held to a higher standard than ordinary editors, and when applicable de-adminship should come swiftly and in no uncertain terms. It could be appealed to Arbcom, but for any reasonable case it should be kept off until the appeal is resolved.
Ec