Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
I am very frustrated.
...
Sadly, although we managed to delete the list of tall
me
once, that
was sent back to AfD and there is no consensus to delete
it. No
consensus in this case means that there is no clear
majority of !votes
- policy and guidelines (which reflect a much wider
consensus) are
that we do not have original research, and there is no
credible
rebuttal of the assertion that the list of tall men is
based on just
that.
I'd support you, but, sadly, I have been blocked since last
year for doing nothing more then trying to apply policy and
remove original research (known as knowledge by consensus
of users, not NPOV sources). If one can make an argument
for content to exist within an article based purely on user
consensus determined by talk page votes - not on NPOV
sources - one can certainly make the same argument for an
entire article. Such is the wikiality.
~~Pro-Lick
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________
Have a burning question?
Go to
www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.