Ah, now I know what you mean, you are talking about the duplication in the
notices.
The disambiguations themselves are needed, but the wording could indeed
improve. I think it's often a leftover from when there's just one other
article to disambiguate with, in which case this is a common wording. Not
sure what's wrong with the wording on the barrel one. The unit and the
actual metal barrel object are different things that can have their own
article.
Mgm
On 2/13/07, Bogdan Giusca <liste(a)dapyx.com> wrote:
I noticed that on some pages with very clear titles we can find
disambiguation notices, like these ones:
<<
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagle_(software)
"This article is about software. For other uses, see Beagle
(disambiguation)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vis_(island)
"This is an article about island named Vis. For the town with the same
name, see Vis_(town)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_(unit)
"See Barrel (disambiguation) for other uses."
>
The point of disambiguation notices is to resolve conflicts when the
title is shared by more than one meaning.
But the title "Beagle (software)" is not at all ambiguous! From the
title anyone can tell it's about a piece of software not a dog or a ship.
The same with "Vis (island)", "Barrel (unit)" and thousands of other
articles.
Then why do we have them?
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l