"Cool Cat" wrote
The wiki way is consensus. Being bold is fine. Anyone can boldly suggests a new categorization scheme.
There needs to be a way to regulate bold decisions that affects tens to hundreds of articles. If you have a better suggestion feel free to suggest it.
There doesn't 'need to be' that. I have gone into mathematics categories with a couple of hundred articles and subdivided them on the fly. This has improved the encyclopedia, and if I had had to await some sort of approval (from whom?) I would not have bothered.
The wiki way is certainly not bound by pre-arranged consensus; much more characteristic of good Wikipedians is how they react to those who find fault with what they do (namely, to take it well).
----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam