Stephen Bain wrote:
On 2/11/07, stvrtg stvrtg@gmail.com wrote:
The whole point of CZ is greater reliability, but:
The article below may contain errors of fact, bias, grammar, etc. The Citizendium Foundation and the participants in the Citizendium project make no representations about the reliability of this article or, generally, its suitability for any purpose. We make this disclaimer of all Citizendium article versions that have not been specifically approved."
Sort of says it all.
Add it to this list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-Wikipedia_disclaimers
Put Citizendium in that list alongside a whole lot of sources that people have actually heard of? A list of "places which are often regarded as reliable"? I think that's giving them a bit more credit than they deserve.
I'm inclined to think that even mentioning them on this list is giving them more credit than they deserve, but I'll be tolerant for now.
-- Tim Starling