Marc Riddell wrote:
on 2/9/07 7:05 AM, Timwi at timwi@gmx.net wrote:
The big problem with this sentiment is that you think that quantity gets in the way of quality. That is a major mistake, because it will stop you from promoting people to adminship who would later turn out to be high-quality admins.
How does the Community define a "quality admin"?
Why do you need such a definition?
What you need a definition for is a "low-quality admin", because those are the ones that you want to demote.
While I don't claim that "low-quality admin" is easier to define, I think that common sense can go a long way there. If an admin performs controversial actions regularly, then you might consider they cause more disruption than they benefit the project. Etc.
Timwi