On 2/2/07, Gregory Kohs <thekohser(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm wondering what the opinions of
"influential Wikipedians" are regarding
this MSNBC poll that shows 40% of over a thousand people think like I do?
I think it ought to be trialled. We're all making a lot of assumptions
about what would happen if paid editing were to occur. Why not do a
trial on a couple of articles, and monitor but not interfere with the
article over a period of a few months?
It would be totally unacceptable to take the position that an article
being worked on by a paid editor could not be edited by anyone else
during that time.
Ec