Here's another example of a perhaps not false but "bad faith" nom.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: Articles_for_deletion/List_of_pseudosciences_and_pseudoscientific_concepts
What really smells about this one is that the nominating account, "Pizzazz" was created on the same day as the nomination and the only thing he did was make the nom in question. I would have no problem with promptly closing such noms regardless of the potential "deletability" of the article.
If an article is to be destroyed, then let it start with a good faith nomination from a real user, not somebody's sock/meat puppet.
PS. The article in question was speedy kept.